The word compendium has several definitions one of which is a box which contains many games, like Ludo, Snakes and Ladders, Chess, Draughts, Dominoes etc. Another is a space saver, like putting several small items on one page of my web site instead of using several pages. Hence, using the 'several things' bit, I can get away with both these definitions.
Here are just a couple of loose items for which I have no dedicated home.
| Q. | USS Phoenix, the Japanese and the British. What have they got in common? | A. |
|
| Q. | Who is this person?
|
A. |
|
| Q. | What rank is this gentleman?
|
A. |
|
| This is him again
|
|
||
Now you know the answer to NAVAL OFFICER 2, why don't you read my LEADING ARTICLE which can be found in NAVY THING MAJOR FEATURE ARTICLES ?
Now for some ANAGRAMS. A little while ago a pal of mine emailed me a list of anagrams and they are so clever, that I want to share them with you. I have added a few of my own, but by and large, I claim no credit for this section of the COMPENDIUM apart from the page design of course!
Here we go then. Don't forget to use your browser BACK button after each answer. What is the ANAGRAM of:-
| Election Results | ANSWER 4.jpg |
| Mother in Law | ANSWER 5.jpg |
| Snooze Alarms | ANSWER 6.jpg |
| A Decimal Point | ANSWER 7.jpg |
| The Earthquakes | ANSWER 8.jpg |
| The Eyes | ANSWER 9.jpg |
| George Bush | ANSWER 10.jpg |
| The Morse Code | ANSWER 11.jpg |
| Slot Machines | ANSWER 12.jpg |
| Animosity | ANSWER 13.jpg |
| Dormitory | ANSWER 14.jpg |
| Presbyterian | ANSWER 15.jpg |
| Astronomer | ANSWER 16.jpg |
| Desperation | ANSWER 17.jpg |
| The Servicemans Pay | ANSWER 18.jpg |
| Eleven plus Two | ANSWER 19.jpg |
| President Clinton of the USA | ANSWER 20.jpg |
| What is the Pusser | ANSWER 21.jpg |
| As to Bunting Tosser | ANSWER 22.jpg |
| Hands to Muster Aft [the first word here could have begun with the letter 'S' {like Oh! Sugar for example} but I am being polite. You can imagine, just settling into a pint and you have just been dealt two aces and a king, when the tannoy calls you to more work or evolutions]. | ANSWER 23.jpg |
You do know that you are not allowed to tell porky pies, or 'engineer' a situation which is false - you do know that? .......next time they change computer keyboards, and I am sure that they will, they ought to put a dwell-a-pause key so that the audience out there know that there is a break to allow readers to gather their thoughts!
On Saturday 2nd July, I visited IFOS in Portsmouth Dockyard. It was my second day there and by mid afternoon I was rather tired - the Dockyard is a big place you know. Very close to what we used to called Fountains Lake Jetty [or thereabouts] I spied a large tent [or a small marquee] with chairs in it, so I went to sit down. Obviously I passed the sign on the door and knew that the owners of this stretch of canvas where the R.N. Presentation Team. 'Action' music was playing and very soon the show started when a male commander and a female lieutenant started their chalk and talk, or more accurately their talk and video screen. The commander had told the audience that this was the third run that day, but as yet, not one person in the audience had asked a question, so would we please pay attention and formulate our question as the show rolled out. Excellent do, as usual, and some embarrassment held for these professionals trying to put over to a less than enthusiastic audience, the need for and the role of our navy. The commander summed up the main points and then asked for any questions. Nothing! No enthusiasm; zilch; stony silence so I put my hand up. I told them I was ex career navy, that I was a submariner starting in the 1950's. I suggested that submarines of my time were horrid things, but that those of today are underwater hotels [not literally but by comparison] moving towards the question of why women can't serve in boats. I wasn't even interested in my own question never mind their answer, but I felt duty bound to stimulate the audience if that were possible. The commander said that women do not serve in boats for metabolic [female that is] reasons, and when I returned to my home, not knowing whether this was correct or not, I checked his answer on the RN website. Sure enough he was bang on for this is what they say
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Answer: Service in submarines is
closed to women because of medical concerns for the safety of the foetus
and hence its mother. This restriction is purely medical and does not
relate to combat effectiveness. The potential risks to the foetus do not
arise from hazardous radiation, but from contaminants in the submarine's
atmosphere.
The Institute of Naval Medicine (INM) reviewed the exclusion in 1999, as did subsequently both the Defence Scientific Advisory Council and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Their outcomes supported the conclusions of the INM report, that the exclusion was justified. |
||
so well done the commander. The female lieutenant then amplified her boss's answer. She said that today's nuclear submariners [SSK or Bomber] still hot-bunked, and described to the audience what that meant. That was another reason why women can't serve in boats she said. With hot-bunking must come hard lying money - one of the reasons for having it - and I find all that too much to believe. Submariners of today have a mess in which they socialise and a separate bunk space in which they sleep and another separate space in which they dine, and yet another in which they can keep clean. We didn't, keep clean that is, not enough water, and in my day, all of that was one space, and on 'S', 'T', 'A' and even 'P' boats that was bloody small. Whilst I can believe the medical experts and their evidence ably stated by the commander, I find it disturbing that half of the Presentation Team is saying things which are not true on a daily basis. By that I mean that hot-bunking may have occurred for some specific reason, but surely, it cannot be the norm in submarines in 2005. If there are submariners reading this page, please tell me whether the lieutenant was wrong or am I misunderstanding modern submarines. I belong to the Gosport Submariners Association so I will ask at our next meeting. If you don't hear further from me, she was wrong, but if she was right, then I will leave this text extant, and write an add-on as an apology.
I read an article yesterday [7th July 2005] about a North Yorkshire policeman who had been drafted to Edinburgh, Scotland to assist with controlling the louts trying to wreck the G8 conference at Gleneagles. Apart from describing his job, he also said that the big Scottish capital city was awesome [he felt lost], let alone facing the scum on the streets. I got to thinking about what a city policeman might think about patrolling the wilds of some national park [Yorkshire's for example] trying to round up pro or anti hunt wreckers. I came up with this anagram.
| COSMOPOLITAN LONDONER [assume my policeman was either a City or a MET copper]= |
|
DID YOU KNOW THAT? [End WW2 to 1950]
Other 'fillers' of interest are, and will be, added to other parts of the site.
Everybody knows about the build up of allied forces in the UK after Pearl Harbour and the entrance into WW2 by the Americans. From 1942 onwards, the Yanks poured into our tiny country although of course not all stayed here - the US Army used the UK as a spring-board to Europe, the US Navy relatively little and the US Air Force as a launch-pad for their famous daylight bombing missions over Germany. However, did you also know that Pearl Harbour caused another mass involvement of US troops on the other side of the world? In the book, 'The Liners' A Voyage of Discovery {ISBN 0752210580} by Rob McAuley, a Boxtree Channel Four Book which accompanied the television series of the same name, he tells the story about the Queen Mary and the Queen Elizabeth the largest liners in the world. From the earliest days of the war they had been secretly routed, zig zagging and at high speed from Scotland, across to the States then out to the Far East, to Singapore and then to Australia. There they moved the cream of Australian men, as fighting soldiers, from Sydney to the Suez time and again. There was no war in the Far East so the ships were safe and the men were needed where the war was raging. In December 1941 everything changed. Australia was now vulnerable to Japanese attack/invasion and the Queens' were needed in the North Atlantic again to ferry across hundreds of thousands of US troops to the UK. The Australian troops, now battle-hardened could not be returned home, so the last job the Queens' did before coming back to the States/UK run, was to ferry 20,000 US Troops to Australia to help protect it against the Japanese. Apart from some Australian territory way north of Australia proper in Port Morseby Papua New Guinea, Australia itself was not attacked or invaded. At least we in Britain looked after our own internal security without having to rely on the Yanks. However, all stop {!} for I have found a further article of relevance. In researching the death of HMS Dorsetshire [of Bismarck fame] on the 5th April 1942 [more about that later in another story [page]] I picked-up on her being in company with HMS Cornwall who was also sunk [great loss of lives with only 1120 survivors from both cruisers] who had been earmarked for Trincomalee on the 8th April, to join military convoy SU4 for passage to Australia after the ANZAC troops were withdrawn from Middle East Operations because of the Japanese threat to Australia. That must have been some blessing because the ANZAC boys were taken away from a real war to rightly go back home to defend their own country by themselves, but since they were not attacked, there must have been some kind of an anti climax for them.